So here's my question (mostly for US this time): What is the difference between Kerry and Bush as far as Iraq goes? It seems they spent a great deal of time "debating Iraq", but the only thing I heard Kerry say he'd do differently is get support from other countries the way Bush is not. From what I understand (not just based on this limited pole), for the most part foreigners aren't going to be that much more supportive of Kerry than they are of Bush, making Kerry's stance kind of empty.
Now certainly there are TONS of differences between the way they want to handle things here at home, but it seems to me there's not much to debate over as far as Iraq goes. I'm not using this as a pro-Bush argument, just an observation that Kerry hasn't done a very good job of differentiating himself from Bush on this point (though that's probably an impossible task given the state of things- we don't have too many choices at this point).
_________________________
-Jeff
Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings; they did it by killing all those who opposed them.