You don't document bullet-proofing, you just *do* it. The better your application is bullet-proofed, the more reliable it is. You don't put into a manual "by the way, our application is bullet proofed against bad data". That'd be like a car owner's manual saying "the new 2008 Ford Compensator has an electrical system that no longer shorts out when you flip the switches in the wrong order".
<tangent>
Well, if that's how you write the documentation, then no, it's not useful to add. However, IMHO as a programmer, you don't put into a manual "our application is bullet proofed against bad data," but you
do put into the manual what your product
does do (skips to the next track), especially if it's non-obvious, when it encounters bad data (corrupted, or non-music files).
A car owner's manual would certainly say "If you flip the switches in the wrong order, all switches are reset to the off position to prevent overloading the electrical system."
</tangent>
That said, not all documentation is end-user documentation. Internal specifications, or even the comments surrounding the code, if either are available, could satisfy the requirements.