Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#207671 - 01/03/2004 11:57 Cheap snowboard gear?
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
I'm looking to get some cheap gear. I'm sick of renting. Need: Boots, bindings, board. Also, I think I want a board-bag to put it in so that it doesn't cut the car interior up. I'm still learning how to snowboard (but getting better each time), but not "into it" enough to want the best and most expensive equipment. I know nothing about what's good and what's not.

I don't mind used gear and I would go to a ski-swap nearby if I were able to find one this season. I get the impression that it would be hit-or-miss in terms of finding boots my size (mens' 11) etc.

By the way, I don't even know how big of a board to get, I always just take whatever the rental guy picks for me. I'm 6 feet tall and weigh 180 at the moment, if that has a bearing.

I've looked on ebay, but it's hard to narrow down listings to include those with bindings and boots and all. Although this guy has an auction he keeps re-running for a relatively cheap ($199.00) package. Does that look any good, or is that complete crap?
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207672 - 01/03/2004 12:04 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
loren
carpal tunnel

Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
Like so many things... you get what you pay for... up to a point. I've never heard of any of those brands. I'd say drive to Reno for a ski swap. They used to have multiples a year... and you can find really good deals there. I got the Santa Cruz board i'm riding now there about 3 years back for $150. Now's not the best time to buy in any case... you'd be way better off if you waited to the season is over and buy last years models or even 2 years back. I got my Burton Step-ins for half price because they were last years model at a local board shop

As for size... you'd probably want around a 153 or so. Maybe a little longer if you like fast wide carving or a bit shorter if you like more control. I ride a 143 and i'm 5' 6". Good rule of thumb is up to your chin.


Edited by loren (01/03/2004 12:08)
_________________________
|| loren ||

Top
#207673 - 01/03/2004 12:06 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
robricc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
I got an email last week from overstock.com about having a Ski and Snowboard sale. The sale seems to be off, but Overstock usually has good prices for most stuff, so maybe check there also.
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736

Top
#207674 - 01/03/2004 12:28 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
davec
old hand

Registered: 18/08/2000
Posts: 992
Loc: Georgetown, TX USA
The Academy Sporting Goods in Austin have 75% off all snowboards. Still haven't figured out where they snowboard in Texas... Or why they carry snow ski and snow boarding gear...
_________________________
Dave Clark Georgetown, Texas MK2A 42Gb - AnoFace - Smoke Lens - Dead Tuner - Sirius Radio on AUX

Top
#207675 - 01/03/2004 13:05 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Definitely what the others have said: wait until the end of the season, then you can probably pick up a bargain.

As for boots: make sure you get some that are comfortable. Don't just assume that they'll break in. They won't. And boots are (IMO) more important than board or bindings to get right. They can make such a difference between being wobbly and being in control.

As for board size, it depends on many factors, mostly weight and height. You're 6 foot and 13 stone, right? In which case I'd argue that you want something like a reasonably stiff 162. Check out this PDF file from Snow + Rock for more information on choosing a board.

For reference, I'm 6 foot, weigh 14 stone, and I ride a 164.
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207676 - 01/03/2004 13:16 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: Roger]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Do you people really use stones? For us Americans, one stone equals 14 pounds, so 13 stone == 182 pounds, 14 stone == 196 pounds.

And this might be a good time to point out Google's calculator, which does unit conversion, too: google://14 stone in pounds
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207677 - 01/03/2004 13:24 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: davec]
Whitey
member

Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 178
Loc: Louisiana, USA
Still haven't figured out where they snowboard in Texas... Or why they carry snow ski and snow boarding gear...

Down mount Bonell!!!! Forget that there is no snow. There are enough loose rocks to have fun on.
We also used them to ski (or wake board really) on lake travis

_________________________
_______________________________________ former owner...now I'm just another schmuck

Top
#207678 - 01/03/2004 14:03 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: wfaulk]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Do you people really use stones?

Yep. We're supposed to use kg these days, but I've no idea what I weigh in kg. I can work it out, obviously, but it just doesn't mean anything to me.
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207679 - 01/03/2004 14:31 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: Roger]
speedy67
enthusiast

Registered: 18/12/2000
Posts: 342
Loc: South-West-Germany
Same for me. I would have made some suggestions, but your units are absolutely meaningless to me.
But the board-length you spoke about is metric, isn't it?
_________________________
cheers, Thomas new owner of the MK1 00123 MK2 12GB 090000815 (my first one) MK2a 040103735 (from 303) and ???

Top
#207680 - 01/03/2004 14:36 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
I'm looking to get some cheap gear. I'm sick of renting. Need: Boots, bindings, board. Also, I think I want a board-bag to put it in so that it doesn't cut the car interior up.

Like Loren has said, boots are the most important, then bindings, then board. Most any name-brand snowboard boot will do as long as it fits correctly (heat moldable inserts will help odd-shaped feet), are warm, and are comfortable. When you try on boots, make sure you have enough room in the toes by standing up with your knees almost locked - you should just be able to brush the end of the boot with your toes. Now sink into your riding stance (bent knees) and your toes will have a bit of extra room. Strap into a board and make sure the boot holds your heel down to the board well. If your heel lifts inside of the boot it'll kill you on toeside turns. My wife and I shopped around for boots that fit her narrow heels for a while before getting some Airwalks for her with heat moldable inserts - that solved her heel lift problems. I would not buy online unless I had tried on the boots in a shop. The rest of the stuff you can buy online, but it's very important you get a good fitting boot. I ride Burton boots, and my wife has Airwalks. Other brands that are good (IMO) are Ride, Salomon, Heelside, Vans and DC.

Bindings just need to fit the boot decently and have ergonomic straps. Strap width and design will provide a level of comfort for your instep, but so will your boots. Primarily here less weight = more expensive. There are some fancy carbon fiber and aluminum models around (including the top of the line Cateks) but the old man in me says BAH! to those. The House has discount gear online, and they have a decent selection of sub-$100 bindings. You might want to try a local SportMart, they carry low to mid quality gear, and they are having a blowout sale last time I was in there. They had a decent selection of boots/boards/bindings, too. There should be one in your area.

By the way, I don't even know how big of a board to get, I always just take whatever the rental guy picks for me. I'm 6 feet tall and weigh 180 at the moment, if that has a bearing.

You should start out with a board that is over 150cm. A smaller board will be easier to learn on, and a larger one might suit you later depending on your riding style and skill level. There are two main construction methods for snowboards, slantwall and capped. You can tell right away which one was used by looking at the edge of the board. If it's slanted at an angle, it's slantwall and if it's rounded over to the metal edge, it's capped. GENERALLY, capped construction is on beginner/cheaper boards. If you are looking at a slantwall/sandwich construction board, it's usually a better quality board. If you don't know what kind of riding you will be doing, just get a freeride board, not a freestyle or mountain. Most low-end boards are freeride. Size 11 boots will probably be OK on a non-wide board, but depending on the stance you prefer you might get some toe overhang. I ride 22 front/ 18 back and I'm a size 10. No toe drag for me on a Burton Custom, and it's an average width board. Brands you could look for are Burton, Solomon, Ride, Never Summer ($$$), K2, Liquid (cheaper), etc. You really won't be able to tell too much of a difference between them when you start out, spend the big bucks later when you get hooked on riding.

I'm still learning how to snowboard (but getting better each time), but not "into it" enough to want the best and most expensive equipment. I know nothing about what's good and what's not.

Make sure you get your stance angles forward (I've found 20 front/ 10-15 back is a good combo for beginners) so you can get the correct upper body position. Have you taken a lesson? Just like anything else, good riding can come faster from good instruction. Having your own equipment helps, too. If you took a lesson, did they teach you the falling leaf and garlands? Those excercies are key to learning how to carve.

When you learn how to carve you will be hooked. Check out Bomberonline for tips on carving. Ignore the hardboot stuff, it's mostly applicable to soft-booters, too. This article and part II should be good reading.

I've looked on ebay, but it's hard to narrow down listings to include those with bindings and boots and all. Although this guy has an auction he keeps re-running for a relatively cheap ($199.00) package. Does that look any good, or is that complete crap?

Complete crap.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207681 - 01/03/2004 14:58 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: cushman]
russmeister
enthusiast

Registered: 14/07/2002
Posts: 344
Loc: South Carolina
I hate to hijack the thread but I'm going skiing in 2 weeks and I have no ski clothing at all. Anyone care to point me in the right direction? Preferably something cheap as this is the first time I've been skiing and I doubt I'll get to go more than once a year.
_________________________
Russ
---------------------------------------------------------
"The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will." Vince Lombardi

Top
#207682 - 01/03/2004 15:15 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: russmeister]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Good ski clothing doesn't have to mean you only wear it for skiing. You could buy a shell jacket that would work for rainy days or cold weather as well as skiing. Layer it with a polyester/wool sweater or a fleece and a polyester t-shirt and you're set. This layer could be a waterproof/breathable layer like Gore-Tex, or it could be a soft shell which is what I bought this year for snowboarding. Ski/snowboard pants are different, you can't use those as much, but you can find some deals around.

I shop REI Outlet and Sierra Trading Post for discount outdoor gear. Sometimes you have to wait a while to get exactly what you want, but this year I bought some Burton snowboarding pants from REI-Outlet for $45.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207683 - 01/03/2004 15:32 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: cushman]
russmeister
enthusiast

Registered: 14/07/2002
Posts: 344
Loc: South Carolina
I found a pair of Blackdot Firebird Snowboard Pants for $59.00 at The-House.com. Is that a good price and a good pair of pants?

_________________________
Russ
---------------------------------------------------------
"The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will." Vince Lombardi

Top
#207684 - 01/03/2004 15:42 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: russmeister]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Sure, they'll work. Black Dot is towards the bottom of the line for snowboard gear, but they will do just fine for your needs.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207685 - 02/03/2004 10:30 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: speedy67]
frog51
pooh-bah

Registered: 09/08/2000
Posts: 2091
Loc: Edinburgh, Scotland
In my age range (early thirties), folks know their hight in feet and inches and their weight in stone, miles make more sense than kilometres and pints are much more popular than half litres.

They tried to teach us metric, but all the numbers are wrong
_________________________
Rory
MkIIa, blue lit buttons, memory upgrade, 1Tb in Subaru Forester STi
MkII, 240Gb in Mark Lord dock
MkII, 80Gb SSD in dock

Top
#207686 - 02/03/2004 10:34 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: frog51]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
I didn't realize the changeover was that recent. I figured it coincided with decimalizing the currency, which was in 1970, wasn't it?
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207687 - 02/03/2004 12:01 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: wfaulk]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
1971/02/15, apparently, but we only changed to metric weights and measures more recently.
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207688 - 02/03/2004 12:05 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Thanks very much to everyone for the informative replies. I will refer to this thread frequently as I shop.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207689 - 02/03/2004 14:43 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
kswish0
enthusiast

Registered: 06/02/2002
Posts: 212
Loc: Virginia, USA
Finally a thread that I can provide some useful information for instead of being the guy asking all the questions. I have a bit of knowledge in the area being an AASI certified snowboard instructor.

Boots:
Getting comfortable boots is very important. It will ruin your whole day on the slopes if your feet hurt. I would recommend getting boots thats you have tried on first. Put them on, lace them up tight and walk around in them for a while. In cheap boots, the foam will sometimes tend to pack out over the day and you have to keep tightening them as this happens. I would recommend boots with a removable liner as they usually give a more snug fit and are easier to clean/dry.

Bindings:
Fairly inexpensive bindings should be fine for you right now. The biggest differences between normal and expensive bindings are the wieght and the adjustability. There are differences in the strength, stiffness, feel, etc. but as a beginner, you wont notice these very much yet so you dont need top of the line bindings.

Board:
The type and size of the board you get depends on a few things. These are your weight, your ability level, and your style of riding.
Length:
Shorter boards are easier to control because there is less swing weight. Longer boards have more effective edge in the snow meaning they hold an edge better.
Stiffnes:
Soft flex boards are very forgiving and easy to learn on. Stiff boards are good for carving but can be very unforgiving.
Width:
Narrow boards are good at transitioning from one turn to the next. Wide boards are good for powder or people with big feet. Unless you are going to be riding a lot of powder, you want the narrowest board you can get depending on the size of your feet.
Base:
Extruded bases are cheaper but are a little bit slower. They are easy to repair though. Sintered bases are a little more expenseive but are faster and more durable. Slightly harder to repair though.
Construction:
Cap construction is where the topsheet rolls over the side and come all the way down to the edges. Sidewall construction is where there is a strip of p-tex between the topsheet and the edge. Some people swear cap construction gives you better edge hold, some people swear sidwall give you better edgehold, I cant really tell a difference. Just different ways to put the board together.
Sidecut:
I would recommend getting a progressive sidecut wich means that the radius of the sidecut is smaller at the back of the board than the front. This makes entering and exiting turns much easier. Although riding switch (backwards) is a little bit harder. Most modern boards have this unless you get a true twin-tip freestyle board.

I'm assuming from what you said that you've been a few times and are starting to get it but still have a lot of improvement to go. And from what I know about you, I'm guessing you probably aren't the type thats going to be going into the park and doing freestyle stuff too much. So based on these 2 assumptions, you're at a hard stage to buy a board at because you want one that is easy to learn on but also one that will allow you to do what you want when you get better. I would probably recommend you go for more of an intermediate level board because they aren't that much harder to control and when you do get better, you will be much happier with a slightly stiffer, longer board than a beginner board would be. For length, I would probably get something around a 157. I've never really liked the guidlines that people give of getting a board that comes up to your chin, or up to your nose or whatever, because height has nothing to do with the length of the board you should ride. Your weight is what you should consider. A snowboard can be thought of as being a leaf spring and its very important to get one that matches your weight. When a snowboard is on its edge, it is bent in the middle, if you are not heavy enough to bend your board in the middle, it will be very hard to turn. If you are too heavy for your board, it will bend more than you want it too and will wash out and be very hard to hold an edge.

http://www.the-house.com is a very good online place to buy snowboarding equipment. A lot of the stuff they sell on there is last seasons models and they have very good prices. They also have some package deals there where you get a board, boots and bindings together for a discount. I got my last board there and was very happy with the service. It got to my house about 3 or 4 days after ordering.

There's a lot more I could say but I guess I'll stop now before I bore everyone too much. Feel free to ask if you have any questions on brands, prices, setting up equipment, etc.

Top
#207690 - 02/03/2004 15:00 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: kswish0]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
That was a very informative post, thanks. Yes, you're right in that I've been up several times and I'm starting to get the hang of it. I see your point about it being a tough time to choose a board.

Right now, my skill level is: I can turn on both my heel and toe sides and maintain my balance in those situations quite well. I can do the "falling leaf" thing in either direction pretty well. I think I've finally settled on a preferred direction (I believe I'm a goofy-foot). My current trouble is transitioning my turns from heel side to toe side and vice-versa, I fall too often in those situations. I'm putting my weight on my back foot too much and I'm having trouble getting used to having my weight fully forward. The last instructor I had tried to explain something about a "triangle" concept for executing turns, something about having to be in a certain triangle-shaped envelope before trying to make a turn, but I didn't understand what he was saying. My friend Tod says I'm just not committing to my turns confidently enough and that's really my only problem.

Based on what you said, I weigh 180 pounds and I have very large feet (size 11), so what width and length of board would you recommend for those specs?
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207691 - 02/03/2004 15:09 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Size 11 is very large?
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207692 - 02/03/2004 15:14 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: wfaulk]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Size 11 is very large?
Okay, it's a bit larger than average. Everywhere I go, the common sizes seem to be between 8 and 10.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207693 - 02/03/2004 15:24 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
robricc
carpal tunnel

Registered: 30/10/2000
Posts: 4931
Loc: New Jersey, USA
Everywhere I go, the common sizes seem to be between 8 and 10.
I wear size 11.5-12 and it never struck me as being large. Everytime I buy shoes in a store (however rare that is), they always seems to stock my size in the style I want. Again, me shopping for shoes in a store is rare, so I may just be getting lucky.

I have a friend that wears a size 14 and he seems to have some problems finding the shoes he wants. 13 seems to be the cut-off for "normal" sizes over here from what I can tell.
_________________________
-Rob Riccardelli
80GB 16MB MK2 090000736

Top
#207694 - 02/03/2004 21:08 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: tfabris]
kswish0
enthusiast

Registered: 06/02/2002
Posts: 212
Loc: Virginia, USA
Size 11 is also what I am and is a hard size to buy snowboards for. The cutoff point for when you should get a wide board is usually size 11 for most companies. This means that normal boards are usually a little bit too narrow for us, and wide boards are usually a little bit too wide for us. Snowboard widths are normally given at the widest part of the nose, the narrowest part in the middle (the waist), and the widest part at the tail. The problem with having these measurements is that your feet go inbetween these points. The board I am riding right now is not a wide board and I havent had too many problems with it. Every once in a while if I'm doing a really hard carve, where I'm really leaning into it, my toes will drag and cause me to fall. But I really have to get the board up on an angle for this to happen, much more of an angle than a beginner/intermediate rider would do. It hasnt been enough of an issue for me to care too much and if it did end up bothering me too much, I could always just buy some risers to put under my bindings.

I would say that a normal to medium width board would probably be fine for you right now. But the best thing for you to do would be to go to a shop and ask someone there. Look at some size 11 boots and put them on top of a board in the angle that you would want them in. A small amount of overhang is ok but you dont want too much. Worst case scenario if you get a board and find that your toes are dragging, you can angle your stance a few more degrees and/or buy some risers. Another thing to remember is that different brands/styles of boots will be different lengths even though they are the same size on the inside.

As to the length of the board, for someone of your weight and ability, I would probably recommend something around 158 plus or minus a few centimeters. This is short enough that it should be pretty easy for you to control and long enough that as your skills progress, it wont be holding you back. There are a lot of online calculators out there where you can punch in your weight, hieght, riding style, etc. that recommend what length of board you should get but you could put the exact same info into all of them and still get different answers. There is no set rule, its all just a matter of opinion. I think people put too much emphasis on the lengths of boards. Look at a ruler, see how long 3 cm is? Barely over an inch. On a board that is almost as tall as you are, an inch isn't really going to make that much of a difference in my opinion. The lengths of boards are usually given from the very tip of the nose to the very tip of the tail in a straight line. Some boards might have a big nose and tail that curve way up while other boards might have small nose and tail that aren't very long. This means that 2 boards which say they are the same length have very different effective edge lengths. If you find a board you really like that isn't exactly the right length you are looking for, I say dont worry about it too much, just get it and have fun.

Top
#207695 - 02/03/2004 22:56 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: kswish0]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
I think people put too much emphasis on the lengths of boards. Look at a ruler, see how long 3 cm is? Barely over an inch. On a board that is almost as tall as you are, an inch isn't really going to make that much of a difference in my opinion. The lengths of boards are usually given from the very tip of the nose to the very tip of the tail in a straight line. Some boards might have a big nose and tail that curve way up while other boards might have small nose and tail that aren't very long.

Right on. Effective edge is what matters, but I would also say that weight plays into it, too. You can buy a shorter board that weighs more than a longer one of a design/brand. This has some bearing on how easily you can push the board around into/through turns, a stage that Tony is at right now (just starting to transition from edge to edge, pre-carving stage). I bought my wife a short, light board and it improved her riding because it was easy for her to "manhandle". When she begins to learn to carve more and use edge pressure and body position to turn the board, then I will buy her one that she can advance on.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207696 - 02/03/2004 23:07 Re: Cheap snowboard gear? [Re: kswish0]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
I just had to say I had a fun day up on the slopes (if you can call them that in Ohio) today. I stuck a short video clip my buddy took today up on my website. Old school style, aww yeah. Remember cross-handed rocket airs?
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207697 - 24/01/2005 00:58 It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Follow up. Just over 1 year later, I actually got around to buying gear.

Arbor Element 66 board, length 166 CM: Click Here.
Gorgeous Koa wood top, carbon fiber strut inside. No graphics, just gorgeous wood. Things I read on the net say it's a great all-around board that cuts turns nicely and that the Koa damps vibrations well.

I'm not sure about the wood, really. I mean... personally, I love it. To me, it looks like a finely-made acoustic guitar. But I've never seen anyone on the slopes with something like that. Everyone else has 1337 graphics and such on their boards. I wanted something different, and this certainly is different. I'm just worried that out on the slopes it will make me look like an old fogey. My wife says it reminds her of a wood-panel-side station wagon. Of course, she only tells me this after we get the thing home. I guess I'll just keep thinking it looks like a Taylor guitar and not care what others think.

Unrelated side note: There was one board at the shop that had a graphic on it that I was tempted to get just because of the graphic. It was a painting by a well-known sci-fi artist who paints a lot of starships. Only I couldn't remember the artist's name. He's the guy that uses a palette knife to paint everything, so the paintings look kind of sloppy and messy, but very technological-looking. Every hull panel and rivet on his starships is a swipe of the palette knife. If anyone can recognize the description of the artist and can name him for me, please post here, it's driving me nuts.

Okay, back on topic: As far as the size is concerned, the board is both very long and very wide. I'd spent some time with shorter/narrower rental boards, and decided I'm a long/wide board kinda guy. When I rent, I have to get the biggest board they've got in stock or it doesn't feel right to me.

K2 Cinch bindings: Click Here.

These bindings are rather cool. They feel and act like strap-in bindings yet you step into them and click the heel in place. They are a similar concept to the Flow brand bindings except they are higher tech, stronger, give more support, and appear to be much better made. I guess it's K2's answer to the Flow binding, a generation later. I went in looking for Flow bindings and the guy showed me these instead and they're much better.

Burton freestyle boots (black): Click Here.

The boots are comfortable, orders of magnitude more comfortable than any rental boots I've ever been in. And they come in half sizes, unlike the boots at the places I rented from.

Burton space sack (black): Click Here.

Basic nylon board-bag. The board, encased in the sack, fits nicely into the back seat of my car. So I can avoid buying a roof rack this season.

Bakoda "Jimmy Driver" adjustment tool:Click Here and then navigate down in the Flash site to find details on the tool.

This is a really cute little tool. Includes a directional ratchet action, and interchangeable magnetic tips that get packed inside its hollow handle. And on the handle is- get this- a whistle. So if I'm like, stuck in an avalanche, I can blow the whistle and hope they find me.

Hey, Be Prepared is the Boy Scout motto, right?

Anyhoo, now that I've got the gear, if it would just FRICKIN' SNOW, that would be nice. Sigh. New York gets a blizzard, and I'm wearing shorts outside today. Someone please inform the National Weather Service that it's January and some of us would like to act like it.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207698 - 24/01/2005 06:36 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Quote:
...Arbor Element 66 board, length 166 CM... As far as the size is concerned, the board is both very long and very wide.


You're not kidding. I currently ride a 164 and I'm thinking of maybe going down a size to a 163 or 162 or so...

Quote:
K2 Cinch bindings


Ooh, they look nice. Shame I only recently (last season) dropped a load of cash on a set of Flows.

How good are they for people with wide feet? I find that normal strap-in bindings can pinch my feet too much, which means they really hurt after a day on the slopes. The Flows seem to fit better -- they spread the forces more evenly -- so they're not uncomfortable.

Quote:
So if I'm like, stuck in an avalanche, I can blow the whistle and hope they find me.


I've got radar reflector thingummies on my boots, so they can dig me out before springtime.

Quote:
if it would just FRICKIN' SNOW, that would be nice


It was snowing in North London when I left home this morning. Didn't look like it was going to settle, though...
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207699 - 24/01/2005 10:48 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
altman
carpal tunnel

Registered: 19/05/1999
Posts: 3457
Loc: Palo Alto, CA
Are there any pics of those bindings in action? I didn't see anything on the page and I'm having some trouble working out how the back folds down enough to let you slide your boot in (ie, it looks like it still has a rear hoop).

Arbor board. Mmmm. I suggest you get a board lock to ensure that your board is still there when you come out after lunch! I was considering an Arbor Element for a while too, seems to have had some good writeups. Still, I love my Custom with the neons under the rear tip...

I thought Tahoe still had shedloads of snow? A few friends just came back from Ferney in Canada and after 9 days of gorgeous snow, it rained solidly for 3 days and pretty much washed the mountain away - no snow left, just mud. Looks like Whistler has been suffering too - when they're quoting "early spring conditions" in January you know things are baaaaaaad.

Hugo

Top
#207700 - 24/01/2005 14:28 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: altman]
kswish0
enthusiast

Registered: 06/02/2002
Posts: 212
Loc: Virginia, USA
Quote:
I'm having some trouble working out how the back folds down enough to let you slide your boot in

The heel cup (rear hoop) folds down along with the highback. The lever on the back of the highback folds down and loosens the cables that you can see in the picture. Those cables go through the heel cup which actually goes about half way through the binding, then are attached to the baseplate. When these cables are loosened, this allows the whole heel cup to pivot down along with the highback. Also the side of the bindings where the straps are attached pivots up from the front, so the straps raise up a little bit as well. Kind of hard to explain without pictures but I hope this helps to give you an idea.


Edited by kswish0 (24/01/2005 14:46)

Top
#207701 - 24/01/2005 14:34 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Quote:
It was a painting by a well-known sci-fi artist who paints a lot of starships. Only I couldn't remember the artist's name. He's the guy that uses a palette knife to paint everything, so the paintings look kind of sloppy and messy, but very technological-looking. Every hull panel and rivet on his starships is a swipe of the palette knife. If anyone can recognize the description of the artist and can name him for me, please post here, it's driving me nuts.

Thanks. I know exactly who you're talking about, I can't remember his name, either, and it's now driving me nuts, too.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207702 - 24/01/2005 14:48 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
g_attrill
old hand

Registered: 14/04/2002
Posts: 1172
Loc: Hants, UK
Quote:
I'm not sure about the wood, really. I mean... personally, I love it. To me, it looks like a finely-made acoustic guitar. But I've never seen anyone on the slopes with something like that. Everyone else has 1337 graphics and such on their boards. I wanted something different, and this certainly is different.

I saw a photo of somebody using a wood-type board only this week. I forget what site but noticed it because they are pretty unusual (not that I've been on the slopes since I was at school).

My boss is currently in Chamonix at the moment (skiing), it was icy when he got there, then it snowed for several days and I think they have now got some serious days in. edit: He just called in and apprently they have LOTS of snow but not much sun.

Meanwhile back the the office (just me here) it's just cold and rainy!

Gareth


Edited by g_attrill (24/01/2005 15:42)

Top
#207703 - 24/01/2005 15:33 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: Roger]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Shame I only recently (last season) dropped a load of cash on a set of Flows. How good are they for people with wide feet?

I'll let you know when I actually get to try them out.

The complaints I've heard about the flows is that they don't cinch tightly enough and therefore don't give as much control.

The biggest difference between the K2 design and the Flow design is that the K2s have an additional articulation. As you lower the heel plate, the instep and toe straps actually hinge upward so that it's easier to get your foot in and out. And when you clip the heel plate in place, the instep and toe straps clamp downward again atop your foot.

I assume that by "pinch", you mean the sides of your feet? The clamping mechanism on these K2s seems to mostly be concerned with downward pressure, not side-pinching pressure, so it's possible this could be a good thing. We'll find out. Hopefully soon...
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207704 - 24/01/2005 15:43 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: altman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Are there any pics of those bindings in action? I didn't see anything on the page and I'm having some trouble working out how the back folds down enough to let you slide your boot in (ie, it looks like it still has a rear hoop).


Yeah, like Kwish said, the back plate hinges down almost completely. Not a full 90 degrees, but perhaps 60-70 degrees. Combined with the extra hinge action where the instep and toe straps lift upwards, it allows your foot to go in pretty easily.

My goal is to be able to insert my foot into it, without clamping it down, before I get off the lift. We'll see if I can actually pull that off or not.

Quote:
Arbor board. Mmmm. I suggest you get a board lock to ensure that your board is still there when you come out after lunch!

Yeah, good point. I think I ought to grab one.

Quote:
Still, I love my Custom with the neons under the rear tip...

Yeah, I liked that feature. Looked for a board with that feature, but there weren't many and in the end I went with the board that looked like it suited my riding style better.

Quote:
I thought Tahoe still had shedloads of snow?

In the sense that the slopes are still covered with some form of particles of frozen H20, yes. But calling that stuff "snow" is like calling McDonald's "cuisine".

I'm hoping my first day out with this board will be on some freshly fallen powder.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207705 - 24/01/2005 16:34 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: g_attrill]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
I saw a photo of somebody using a wood-type board only this week. I forget what site but noticed it because they are pretty unusual (not that I've been on the slopes since I was at school).

This year Burton has a build-your-own option for the Series 13 boards where you can get mahogany, maple, etc. topsheets custom made for your deck. Pretty nice (I ride a Burton Custom and the Custom X looks rad), but I can't justify spending $800+ on a new deck. You do get your name printed on the board, though.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207706 - 24/01/2005 17:13 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Quote:
The complaints I've heard about the flows is that they don't cinch tightly enough and therefore don't give as much control.


I'll agree that they don't give as much control because they flex a little, but I don't think it's as bad as some people imply, and it's not been a problem for me yet.

I'm planning on upgrading to a K2 Nemesis at some point soon (my Salomon W5 is broken), and that's a springier board, so it might be less forgiving (it's also narrower; I'm hoping it'll make my cornering quicker) -- in which case the Flow bindings might start to show a difference.

I agree that Flows or step-ins or something else like that are a must-have though -- just ask Hugo how irritating he found it when I got out on the slopes at Whistler last season with my new Flows, and he still had to wrestle with normal-style bindings .
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207707 - 24/01/2005 18:06 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
loren
carpal tunnel

Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
I just bought a pair of those same Burton boots a month ago and LOVE them. They are by far the best snowboard boots I've ever worn. I was trudging around snow fields and lakebeds for an entire day in them 3 weeks back and ended up wearing them back to the hotel they felt so nice, and with just my normal socks as well. I couldn't get over it since every other boot I've worn I wanted out of as soon as possible. Good choice.
_________________________
|| loren ||

Top
#207708 - 24/01/2005 18:27 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: Roger]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
I agree that Flows or step-ins or something else like that are a must-have though -- just ask Hugo how irritating he found it when I got out on the slopes at Whistler last season with my new Flows, and he still had to wrestle with normal-style bindings

Yup, that's a big part of the reason I wanted some kind of fast click-and-go system. The less time I spend sitting in the snow and fiddling with my bindings, the more runs I get in.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207709 - 24/01/2005 18:31 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: loren]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
I just bought a pair of those same Burton boots a month ago and LOVE them. They are by far the best snowboard boots I've ever worn.

Oh, cool, thanks, I'm very glad to hear that. When I tried them on, they were quite comfortable, but I didn't know how they performed in the long run. They were some of the less-expensive boots the shop had, so I wasn't sure if I was skimping or not. But they sure were comfortable.

My concern when trying them on was that they have a somewhat soft ankle. I can crouch and get the ankles to bend a lot easier than I would with a stiffer boot. So I'm worred that they might not give me as much control, either that or they'll make my calves tired having to twist harder to get the same results. How have they been in that regard?
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207710 - 24/01/2005 18:56 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: wfaulk]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Thanks. I know exactly who you're talking about, I can't remember his name, either, and it's now driving me nuts, too.

I asked my friend Maya about this, because she's in the industry and has had a number of different artists illustrate her published works. The name she came up with is Terri Czeczko. An example of his work is attached to this post, scanned from one of her author's copies. I can't find any other examples of his work on the web.

That cover looks almost like the stuff I remember from that artist I'm thinking of, but it's perhaps a little bit too clean and nice. The artist I'm thinking of seemed somehow sloppier to me. Also, the artist I'm thinking of is well-known enough that I'd expect, once I knew his name, a Google would produce tons of results. I'm not getting those results from googling Terri Czeczko.

Anyone else?


Attachments
246698-Terri_Czeczko.jpg (191 downloads)

_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207711 - 24/01/2005 18:58 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
DLF
addict

Registered: 24/07/2003
Posts: 500
Loc: Colorado, N.A.
Hope you Froogled and PriceGrabbed the ever-lovin' crap out of your list before paying some of those retail prices...
_________________________
-- DLF

Top
#207712 - 24/01/2005 19:04 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Yup. Very similar style with a different technique. Czeczko was obviously very influenced by the guy we're thinking of. I've got a friend who has a bunch of scifi art books. I might drop by his place after work to find the name of that guy we're trying to come up with.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207713 - 24/01/2005 19:10 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: DLF]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Hope you Froogled and PriceGrabbed the ever-lovin' crap out of your list before paying some of those retail prices...

Not at all. I'm sure that I paid too much. But I got the stuff at a local board shop that was recommended by friends as being the best place to get stuff. The person who sold me the gear was very knowledgable and helpful, and who personally promised me that he would take care of me as a customer (i.e., if the board needs some kind of repair just bring it in and they'll just do it). He wasn't just a salesperson, he actually worked on the boards and seemed to really know his stuff.

There are times when I'm happy to pay a few dollars more, if I'm able to get good advice and service. Doing a bit of online research after-the-fact, it looks like I might have been able to save about $100 or so by ordering the same items online. But with a purchase this large and this important, and especially since I know so little about the gear myself, I think the extra cash for the in-person aspect was worth it.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207714 - 24/01/2005 19:12 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
Yeah. Online purchasing usually only really works if you know almost exactly what you want before you start.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207715 - 24/01/2005 19:41 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
DLF
addict

Registered: 24/07/2003
Posts: 500
Loc: Colorado, N.A.
You've got a point there, esp. if you needed tons of advice & counsel. Some folks (my best friend among them) actually find that even the much-maligned new-car dealerships still provide them/him with some added value that a dreamed-for-by-me direct link into the car-maker's online ordering/production/inventory/shipping system(s) would not equal. BAH-Humbug, I say, froggling away at my lonely keyboard.
_________________________
-- DLF

Top
#207716 - 24/01/2005 19:42 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
bonzi
pooh-bah

Registered: 13/09/1999
Posts: 2401
Loc: Croatia
Quote:
My wife says it reminds her of a wood-panel-side station wagon.

Well, the icon leading to description of 'Woodie Collection' does seem to depict an ancient, presumably wood-panel-sided station wagon
_________________________
Dragi "Bonzi" Raos Q#5196 MkII #080000376, 18GB green MkIIa #040103247, 60GB blue

Top
#207717 - 24/01/2005 20:27 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: Roger]
altman
carpal tunnel

Registered: 19/05/1999
Posts: 3457
Loc: Palo Alto, CA
Quote:
I agree that Flows or step-ins or something else like that are a must-have though -- just ask Hugo how irritating he found it when I got out on the slopes at Whistler last season with my new Flows, and he still had to wrestle with normal-style bindings .


Yeah, I'm pretty sure Roger got bored with me saying "hang on, hang on, just a minute... RATCHET, WORK DAMN YOU... with you in a ...."

The Salomon SP3's I had before were easier, as the toe strap was captive so it just pivoted down. These Burton Missions are a pain to get into, but the highback is very adjustable and as a binding it seems to work just fine. I just need to be more flexible so that strapping in isn't such a pain!

Hugo

Top
#207718 - 24/01/2005 21:54 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: bonzi]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Well, the icon leading to description of 'Woodie Collection' does seem to depict an ancient, presumably wood-panel-sided station wagon

Heh, I hadn't noticed that. I'll have to show that to my wife, she'll get a real kick out of it.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207719 - 25/01/2005 00:09 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
loren
carpal tunnel

Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
Quote:
My concern when trying them on was that they have a somewhat soft ankle. I can crouch and get the ankles to bend a lot easier than I would with a stiffer boot. How have they been in that regard?


Honestly I can't say how they'll be on the slopes. I've used them twice and both times it was for snowkiting, so I haven't taken them on any runs yet. I've just been super impressed with their ability to stay comfy and warm while trudging through snow all day as well as with use for kiting.

I didn't notice that they had too much play when I was on my board in the field though... I do like a looser ankle though. My knees KILL me if i'm really locked in and can't tweak at the ankle a bit.
_________________________
|| loren ||

Top
#207720 - 25/01/2005 16:54 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: altman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Are there any pics of those bindings in action? I didn't see anything on the page and I'm having some trouble working out how the back folds down enough to let you slide your boot in (ie, it looks like it still has a rear hoop).


I was bored and wanted an excuse to take it out and play with it again, so I made you a video clip of how the bindings work. Click here. (Edit: Also here)

Note how it hinges up the front so that there's more room to get the foot in.

My only worry is that, with all those high-tech moving parts, that it will be fragile and break. I read a rumor that they do, in fact, break sometimes. Hopefully mine will last. If they don't, I'm glad I've got the manual and warranty and such, and that I got them at a reputable dealer with a reputation for good customer service...
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207721 - 25/01/2005 21:01 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
loren
carpal tunnel

Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
That's pretty slick. Wow, that board is beautiful.
_________________________
|| loren ||

Top
#207722 - 25/01/2005 22:12 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: loren]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Hey, thanks, that was my reaction to seeing the board, too. Something about really nice wood grain "gets me".
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207723 - 25/01/2005 23:10 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
wfaulk
carpal tunnel

Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
John Berkey.

Phew.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk

Top
#207724 - 25/01/2005 23:41 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: wfaulk]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
YES!

I knew I would remember his name as soon as I heard it.

THANK YOU!

Now to look up a bunch of his art on the web...

Anway, to finish the thought I started earlier in the thread, I almost bought a board just because the top graphic was a John Berkey painting. I thought it was pretty darn cool.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207725 - 25/01/2005 23:49 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
This is one of his two Star Wars posters that I had as a kid. His other one is visible on this page.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207726 - 25/01/2005 23:54 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Oh. Duh.

The second star wars poster wasn't a poster. It was the cover of the fricking 1977 novelization of the film. Why didn't I remember that he did the novel cover? Argh. Mind like a sieve.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207727 - 26/01/2005 01:01 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Forgot to say this yet, but my buddy has an Arbor board from 2000 and he loves it, the Element looks nice, but most importantly it's a good performer, too.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207728 - 26/01/2005 07:33 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: altman]
Shonky
pooh-bah

Registered: 12/01/2002
Posts: 2009
Loc: Brisbane, Australia
Quote:
I thought Tahoe still had shedloads of snow? A few friends just came back from Ferney in Canada and after 9 days of gorgeous snow, it rained solidly for 3 days and pretty much washed the mountain away - no snow left, just mud. Looks like Whistler has been suffering too - when they're quoting "early spring conditions" in January you know things are baaaaaaad.
Hugo


Awww man. I'm going to Silver Star next week. Have skied a fair bit before but I'm gonna try snowboarding this time so I've been reading this thread with interest.
_________________________
Christian
#40104192 120Gb (no longer in my E36 M3, won't fit the E46 M3)

Top
#207729 - 26/01/2005 16:31 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: Shonky]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Have skied a fair bit before but I'm gonna try snowboarding this time

Okay, just know this:

Your first few times snowboarding will be completely unproductive, painful, annoying affairs. You will be utterly unable to maintain balance on the board and will spend most of your time trying to get up from a fall.

And on a snowboard, getting up from a fall is an extremely large PITA until after you've done it about a million times and you get the hang of it.

Your first lessons on the board will be your instructor shouting at you to keep your weight on your front foot, and talking about how to carve a proper turn, etc. etc.... And all of that will be mostly a waste. All you're learning at first is the muscle-memory to be able to keep your balance on the board. And that takes a lot of time, a lot of falls, and a lot of patience.

But... Once you're past all that... Snowboarding is incredibly fun. And your skill level starts to go up exponentially. I've both skiied and snowboarded, and I much prefer snowboarding, even though it was a lot harder to learn.

Good luck.

PS: Stay on the groomed part of the runs until you're good at it. If you fall in deep powder with a snowboard, it's more or less impossible to get up without unhooking the board.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207730 - 26/01/2005 16:32 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
my buddy has an Arbor board from 2000 and he loves it, the Element looks nice, but most importantly it's a good performer, too.

Thanks, I'm looking forward to discovering how good of a performer it is. Hopefully tomorrow!
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207731 - 26/01/2005 21:04 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Quote:
Okay, just know this:


Yeah, what he said. Plus: buy some wrist-guards. You'll need them.
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207732 - 26/01/2005 21:49 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: Roger]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
I've heard arguments both for and against wrist guards. I've got them and use them every time, and there have been a couple of falls I've had where I think they prevented injury. As a guitarist, that's quite important to me.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207733 - 26/01/2005 21:57 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Oh. And another thing:

As you're learning to make turns, what you find is that fear is your greatest enemy.

Once you start to get your balance and start learning to turn, what you quickly discover is that in order to change your turn direction, you need to aim the board downhill and start going fast.

And of course, fast scares you if you're not confident on the board yet.

So what you want to start concentrating on is getting over that fear. Embrace that vertigo in the pit of your stomach, and just DIVE INTO THAT F*CKING TURN. Once you start moving straight down the hill, it's fairly easy to curve into a turn quickly, and once you're turning you can dig in as hard as you need to for slowing down or going sideways across the hill.

In other words, changing your turn direction seems like it would make you go fast, but if you just get over yourself and just DO it, then you still have complete control over your speed and you really didn't have anything to be afraid of in the first place.

Just get over that fear of the downward dive and you'll have won 99 percent of the battle.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207734 - 27/01/2005 01:08 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
kswish0
enthusiast

Registered: 06/02/2002
Posts: 212
Loc: Virginia, USA
Quote:
Your first lessons on the board will be your instructor shouting at you to keep your weight on your front foot, and talking about how to carve a proper turn, etc. etc.... And all of that will be mostly a waste.

Being a snowboarding instructor, I find this very funny. Its good to see it from a students point of view.

Quote:
As you're learning to make turns, what you find is that fear is your greatest enemy.

So very true. One of the hardest things to do as an instructor is to get my students to commit to making their turns. They usually freak out just as Tony described and end up falling down. If they would just commit to the turn and do it with a little bit of confidence, they would be able to get it much easier.

Top
#207735 - 27/01/2005 01:12 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Some things I've learned:

Helmet.

Learn to strap in standing up. Easiest way is to place your board perpendicular to the fall line, dig your heel in to chop out a platform, then balance there while strapping in. I can strap in much faster this way and never get my butt wet.

Did I mention to get a helmet?

Keep your chest pointed towards the tip of your board while riding. This drives good position when turning and carving. You should be slightly crouched, knees bent and hands forward for balance, a little wider than shoulder width apart. Like you have your hands on a counter. I find positive angle stances help me keep this position, about 24 front and 12 back.

Red makes some good helmets.

Learn how to carve, not turn (sliding), carve. This is where the tail of your board will follow in the same track as the tip of your board, creating a trench for skiiers to fall in (I used to ski too). This increases the fun factor by 2x-3x. I could spend all day at the park, or carving the groomers - either way I'd have a good time. Bomberonline.com has some good articles on learning to carve.

Helmets are useful if you run into something, but also work when someone runs into you.

Have fun! Snowboarding is about finding your own style, I have a ton of fun exploring the sides of trails for small banks, jumps, bits of powder, etc. There's always a way to have a good time with a snowboard, especially if you're riding with a bunch of friends.

A helmet bit my sister once. No realli!
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207736 - 27/01/2005 02:50 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: kswish0]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Being a snowboarding instructor, I find this very funny. Its good to see it from a students point of view.

Woops, I've been caught. Okay, what I meant to say is...

You will remember everything the instructor told you, and it will all help you later. Listen to your instructor, and remember.

A lot of what he says won't apply the first several times you're up there because you don't have enough balance yet to apply it. But after you're going out by yourself and really starting to link your turns, then everything he said will start to come back and start to make sense.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207737 - 27/01/2005 03:06 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
I find positive angle stances help me keep this position, about 24 front and 12 back.


You turn both bindings so that your feet point somewhat forward? I'm so tempted to do this myself because I think I feel more comfortable that way. The guy at the board shop had my back foot slighly backwards and my front foot only about 15 degrees forward. I changed it to 15 and 0, and if that still doesn't feel right tomorrow, I'll turn them both more forward. I'm glad I've got my own board and a field adjustment tool, I'm going to enjoy experimenting with different stances.

Quote:
A helmet bit my sister once. No realli!

"The people responsible for sacking the original poster have now been sacked."
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207738 - 27/01/2005 11:32 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
Quote:
I find positive angle stances help me keep this position, about 24 front and 12 back.

You turn both bindings so that your feet point somewhat forward? I'm so tempted to do this myself because I think I feel more comfortable that way. The guy at the board shop had my back foot slighly backwards and my front foot only about 15 degrees forward. I changed it to 15 and 0, and if that still doesn't feel right tomorrow, I'll turn them both more forward.

Your first stance from the board shop is called duck stance. Many freestyle riders use this because it gives them better control when riding fakie (switch). I don't like it because it throws my carving stance off. Look at the hard boot dudes, they all have extremely positive angles - like 55-60 degrees or more on both feet. It comes down to the type of riding you'll be doing and your personal preference, but for big mountain carving and general downhill riding (not freestyle or halfpipe) postitive angles probably would help.

Check your stance width, too. You probably should center this at first and then adjust it after you've ridden it a while. Most riders I see have their stance too wide - again for freestyle focus, stability on landings, etc.

Quote:
I'm glad I've got my own board and a field adjustment tool, I'm going to enjoy experimenting with different stances.

Just don't mess with it too much all at once, or you get the eye doctor syndrome: "which is better, this or this?", "uhhh.. can't tell the difference".
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207739 - 27/01/2005 23:58 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Your first stance from the board shop is called duck stance. Many freestyle riders use this because it gives them better control when riding fakie (switch).


Gah. I tried to explain to the guy that I wasn't a freestyler, I only did downhill. But he still tried to set me up like I was some kind of stunt pilot.

Well, today I spent a LOT of time fiddling and adjusting the bindings, and I'm not sure if I was doing the right things or not. I couldn't get everything quite comfortable. I kept trying different angles and stances and NOTHING felt right to me.

I didn't try extreme forward angles. I only tried maximum of 15 back and 20 front, and it felt extremely wrong to me so I dialed all the way back to 0 0 and started working from there again. Actually, 0 0 didn't feel so bad. As long as I had my stance narrow enough. The guy at the shop had set it way too wide to start with.

By the end of the day I was at 0 back and 10 front with a farily narrow stance and that felt almost right. My real problem is fatigue, not being able to really REST upon my feet and board when moving. On the rental boards with the step-in boots, there were times when I could just relax my stance and not exert any muscle pressure in any direction and I would just cruise straight. When I did that today, that relaxation made my board catch and turn and mess up and such. I wanted to get my weight onto my front foot so I could relax a bit, but I ended up having to pull and twist my front foot's position so much, so hard, for so long, just to go straight, that my legs just ache after each run.

So I'm still trying to decide what to do about my stance. Simple question, but perhaps a not so simple answer: Which is better, stance forward on the board, or stance backward on the board? i.e., center of gravity mostly forward or mostly backward?

And I don't mean whether my feet hang farther off the toe edge or the heel edge. I mean forward or backward along the travel direction of the board. For instance, I'm goofy foot so I travel to my right. Should my stance be more towards the right end of the board, thus making the tail of the board longer, or just the opposite?

Aside from my stance problems, though, I had a great day. Took my daughter with me (she played hookey from school today) and we had a great time. She's learning how to ski and she did really well today. She can go down all the beginner runs unassisted without falling, making nice big turns and stops.

Overall, my reviews of the equipment after one days' use, are as follows:

Arbor Element Board:
Wow. This is one fantastic board. It felt good all day (when my stance adjustment issues are subtracted from the equation that is), was stable on both ice and powder and everything in between. And it got a compliment from some younger boarders, too. "Duuuuude, that's a sweet board. The wood and all? Something to be proud of."

Very very happy with the choice of that board.

Burton Freestyle Boots:
Loren is right, these are very comfortable. Stiff enough to transmit my commands to the board, but flexible enough to keep me comfortable.

I had the pain and tiredness in my feet, ankles, and calves, but I'm pretty sure it was my need to find a good stance adjustment, and not the boots. The way my legs/feet felt would change with each stance adjustment I made.

K2 Cinch Bindings:
Okay, these are a lot more fiddly than I thought they would be. They're not as easy to step into as the Flows. It takes some doing to step into these. Perhaps I just need practice.

One thing you quickly learn is that there is absolutely no way to step into these things when sitting down. You must be standing flat to get into them and must crouch while standing to close that back latch. This is not that big of a deal because, truthfully, that's the whole reason I got them is because I didn't WANT to have to sit down to get into my bindings.

Another thing... Since the back doesn't fold back perfectly flat, you could theoretically run into trouble if your chairlift is very low to the ground. As you're getting onto the lift, your back binding is underneath the chair. The backs of these bindings could get literally snapped off if the chairlift is all the way to the ground.

So you absolutely have to get in the habit of folding the heel plate fully forward into its packing/travel position before getting onto the lift. Now, I didn't run into that problem at the place I went to today, because their lifts had at least 12 inches clearance with the ground at the load point. But I could see it might be a problem in some situations.

The next thing is, I was hoping that I could just step into the binding (leaving it open but stepping into it loosely) as I got off the chair lift. Thus giving me more control when I got off the lift and less likely to fall. (I hate using the stomp pad, I have zero control over the board when my back foot is there.) Well, that sort of worked and sort of didn't. Yes, I have the ability to slip my foot loosely into the binding before I get off the lift. Yes, it gives me control and balance as I'm getting off the lift so I don't fall when I do that. So, the bindings are a big success in that area.

Except...

The lift operators get mad when I do it. I don't know why. You'd think they'd want me to be less likely to fall and block the lift exit. I think that when they see me do it, they see it from a distance, so they think I'm latched in with both feet when I'm not really.

So I'm practicing the technique of watching the lift operator watch me. When I can tell they've gotten a good look at my free dangling back foot, and then look away, then I can start to slip my foot into that back binding at the last moment just before getting off the lift. Then they have nothing to complain about. That seemed to work for me today.

So why do I say these bindings are "fiddly"? Two reasons.

1. I may be able to slip my foot easily in there partially in a casual way just to get off the lift. But when I really go to get my foot in for real and clamp that back latch, it takes a bit of doing. You really have to jam your foot in there pretty seriously to get the toe to move all the way forward. It's not like air, it's like kind of snug as you might expect. With a little practice, I think I can get this down to a science where I really can just step in, reach down, flip the latch into place, and go. But right now it takes some foot wiggling and a couple of latch flip attempts before it works.

2. The whole idea was that the ratcheted toe and instep straps would be a "set it and forget it" affair. I'd set them once at the beginning of the day and then wouldn't have to undo them again for the rest of the day. At least that's what I expected. Instead, what happens is, when you've got your back foot out of the binding and walking around getting on and off lifts and such, somehow those ratchets just loosen up and come completely undone. So you step into the binding, flip the back latch up, and... what? The instep strap is completely undone? WTF? When did that happen? So you're still back to bending over and ratcheting that into place. At that point I might as well have bought an ordinary strap-in binding because the thing hasn't saved me from any fiddling.

Now, that second thing didn't happen every time. Most of the time everything stayed in place and it was truly a snap-right-in situation. So what I need to do is figure out what I'm doing differently between the times it works right and the times it doesn't. Maybe it's when I fold the thing forward into the "travel" position that the instep strap comes undone. I'll have to look closer at it.

Bakoda Jimmy Driver Adjustment Tool:

Okay, this thing was pretty darn cool. Very cool field adjustment tool. Worked an absolute treat, it's handle is the perfect shape for operating from inside the binding. The thing fits into the space under the straps perfectly and just works. I know it's strange to be waxing poetic about a fricking screwdriver, but I'm serious, this is a cool little tool.

So, well, um, there it is.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207740 - 28/01/2005 00:25 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
Well, today I spent a LOT of time fiddling and adjusting the bindings, and I'm not sure if I was doing the right things or not. I couldn't get everything quite comfortable. I kept trying different angles and stances and NOTHING felt right to me.

Coming from rentals this is going to happen. Keep trying new things, but don't switch it up too much or else you won't know if you're on the right track - maybe 2 or 3 stance changes per day.

Quote:
On the rental boards with the step-in boots, there were times when I could just relax my stance and not exert any muscle pressure in any direction and I would just cruise straight. When I did that today, that relaxation made my board catch and turn and mess up and such. I wanted to get my weight onto my front foot so I could relax a bit, but I ended up having to pull and twist my front foot's position so much, so hard, for so long, just to go straight, that my legs just ache after each run.

What are you going straight for, anyway?
Rentals are sloppy messes. You've got a nice board with a good human->board interface and edges that are actually sharp. This will cause you to have problems trying to "rest" while crusing straight. I usually keep a slight edge one way or the other on the flats.

Quote:
So I'm still trying to decide what to do about my stance. Simple question, but perhaps a not so simple answer: Which is better, stance forward on the board, or stance backward on the board? i.e., center of gravity mostly forward or mostly backward?

Centered is usually best, 1"-2" back for powder. You can set your bindings back 1" if it feels better, but never forward of center.

Quote:
I had the pain and tiredness in my feet, ankles, and calves, but I'm pretty sure it was my need to find a good stance adjustment, and not the boots. The way my legs/feet felt would change with each stance adjustment I made.

Do you have a snowboard-specific pair of socks? I have a pair from Fox River and they really help to relieve pressure where it counts. Definately more comfortable after getting a pair of these - I used to use single-thickness ski socks, but these are the cat's whiskers.

Quote:
Since the back doesn't fold back perfectly flat, you could theoretically run into trouble if your chairlift is very low to the ground. As you're getting onto the lift, your back binding is underneath the chair. The backs of these bindings could get literally snapped off if the chairlift is all the way to the ground.

Yeah, this sucks. Chairs are supposed to be about 18" off the ground, but I've run into this problem with my old school Burton 3-strap bindings, which are rigid highbacks. You just have to watch to see if the chair is going to compress too much, I guess.

Quote:
The next thing is, I was hoping that I could just step into the binding (leaving it open but stepping into it loosely) as I got off the chair lift. Thus giving me more control when I got off the lift and less likely to fall. (I hate using the stomp pad, I have zero control over the board when my back foot is there.)

You should probably practice with the stomp pad, everyone else uses one.

Quote:
The lift operators get mad when I do it. I don't know why. You'd think they'd want me to be less likely to fall and block the lift exit. I think that when they see me do it, they see it from a distance, so they think I'm latched in with both feet when I'm not really.

Because if you fall while your foot is even semi-strapped in they have to stop the lift. You're not as agile with both feet strapped in.

Quote:
The whole idea was that the ratcheted toe and instep straps would be a "set it and forget it" affair. I'd set them once at the beginning of the day and then wouldn't have to undo them again for the rest of the day.

I don't think this is actually a realistic goal. I even loosen up my front binding a few clicks when riding the lift because it's more comfortable, but each run I might adjust the binding tighter or looser based upon what I'm doing. If I'm hitting the park, I'll keep them looser, but if I'm carving the groomers I'll tighten them down until my toes are blue.

Sounds like you still had a good time!
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207741 - 28/01/2005 00:54 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Coming from rentals this is going to happen.

Good to know it's not me. Thanks.

Quote:
What are you going straight for, anyway?

Actually, there's one very long lazy run at the park we were at today... Near the end there is a very long straightaway with a short flat/uphill section. To prevent from having to unclip and hike, I need to keep my speed up through that straightaway, so I can crest the hill.

Quote:
Centered is usually best, 1"-2" back for powder. You can set your bindings back 1" if it feels better, but never forward of center.

Okay, cool. A simple answer after all! Will check the positioning with a tape measure tonight.

Quote:
Do you have a snowboard-specific pair of socks? I have a pair from Fox River and they really help to relieve pressure where it counts. Definately more comfortable after getting a pair of these

No, I don't have anything snowboard-specific. But comfort and pressure in the boots aren't at issue. My feet were very comfortable all day. It was my stance that was killing me.

Quote:
You should probably practice with the stomp pad, everyone else uses one.

Yeah, I've done it enough so that it's not as big of a problem as it used to be. I can usually get off the lift OK on the stomp pad. I just hate that feeling of lack of control I get without that back foot in its real place.

The other thing is, until I get the stance dialed in, I don't want to actually stick the stomp pad onto the board. I want to know where that back binding is going to live before I put the stomp pad in place. So today there was no stomp pad at all on the board.

Quote:
I don't think this is actually a realistic goal.

Well, okay, to clarify:

My goal was that the toe and instep straps would still be at the same adjustment when I stepped back into the binding, as they were when I stepped out of the binding before getting on the lift.

I mean yes, as the day progresses, conditions change, my feet settle into the boots, etc., I'm going to change the strap adjustments. My beef was that the straps were coming fully undone all by themselves, with complete disregard for where I'd put them before.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207742 - 28/01/2005 01:12 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
Okay, cool. A simple answer after all! Will check the positioning with a tape measure tonight.

No need, most boards come with a center mark indicator on the 4x4 (or 3d) hole pattern. Yours does.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207743 - 28/01/2005 03:40 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Which, of course, I discovered.

And also discovered that the front mount-holes are four inches farther from the tip of the board than the rear mount-holes are from the tail of the board.

So I guess what I'm saying is...

By "centered", do you mean centered on the mount-holes based on that center mark you described, or, do you mean measurably centered between the tip and the tail of the board?

I'm guessing you mean the former.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207744 - 28/01/2005 04:17 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
By "centered", do you mean centered on the mount-holes based on that center mark you described, or, do you mean measurably centered between the tip and the tail of the board?

Weeeelll, I meant centered on the mounting inserts.

BUT, measuring from the tip and the tail to the center points doesn't tell you how far away you are from the center of the effective edge (the place on the board that comes into contact with the snow). The board you have, like most others on the market, is directional - it has a tip and tail that are not identical. Some board manufacturers used to set the center of their inserts 1" from the center of the effective edge as a kind of standard, not sure if that is still in use today.

Short story: go with the center marks and adjust from there. If you are in buried-to-your-neck powder, set them back so you won't have to work at keeping your nose up the whole time.
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207745 - 28/01/2005 04:48 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Okay, that's clear and straightforward. Thanks.

Also, just wanted to note how... I started this thread a year ago with the title "cheap snowboard gear" and ended up getting gear that was certainly not cheap at all.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207746 - 28/01/2005 07:03 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Quote:
You should probably practice with the stomp pad, everyone else uses one.


I've got a Dakine stomp pad (click on Snowboard - Accessories - Traction/Stomps) on my board. It's one of the really spiky ones; I find that, with it, I don't worry so much about getting off the lift with one foot out, because I get really good traction off of it.

As far as positioning it goes, I simply put the bindings in the most forward spot and then stuck the pad down so it didn't interfere. My bindings are still in the most forward spot, but I've still got the option of moving them.
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207747 - 28/01/2005 15:26 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: Roger]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
That looks really good, thanks. I'll see if I can find one rather than put the cheapo one I've got onto the board.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207748 - 28/01/2005 18:56 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
DLF
addict

Registered: 24/07/2003
Posts: 500
Loc: Colorado, N.A.
That was kinda my point in busting your ShoppingBot chops, as it were., Tony.
_________________________
-- DLF

Top
#207749 - 30/01/2005 01:21 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Okay, I spent another day with the board and I think I've got everything dialed in the way I like it. I'm basically back to centering everything on the little marks, back foot 0 angle, front foot 15 angle, and I'm all good to go.

I had a fantastic day of carving turns in buttery snow under gorgeous clear skies. The new board is light, springy, and responsive, and I was able to do a lot of stuff I haven't been able to do before.

My only remaining issue with my stance setup is a slightly nagging problem where the pinky toe on my right foot (goofy foot forward) stayed numb most of the day. I don't think it was related to the tightness of the boot, because I loosened it and loosened the straps on the binding and it didn't change. It was something about they way things are when I'm carving that just cuts off the circulation to that toe. I seem to recall this happening with rental boards and boots, too, and I thought it was just those crappy rental boots. Now it's happening with a completely different kind of boot and binding. So I'm not certain what the cause might be.

I should find an anatomy reference so I can find what artery supplies the pinky toe and trace it back to the source of the problem.

The only bad news is that one of those fancy complicated K2 bindings malfunctioned today. The cable that holds the tension on the backplate tends to sneak out of the back latch sometimes. You can't see it well at the link above, but there's a kind of metal "crimp" on the cable that's supposed to keep it more or less in place as you latch and unlatch the binding. But at one point it was halfway out of the back latch when I flipped it into place, and it kind of got stuck and bent funny. Now getting in and out of that binding involves an unnatural amount of fiddling with the cable.

The good news is that I stopped by the snowboard shop on the way home and they're just gonna take care of it for me. (This is the reason I bought it where I did of course.)
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207750 - 30/01/2005 02:07 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
cushman
veteran

Registered: 21/01/2002
Posts: 1380
Loc: Erie, CO
Quote:
My only remaining issue with my stance setup is a slightly nagging problem where the pinky toe on my right foot (goofy foot forward) stayed numb most of the day. I don't think it was related to the tightness of the boot, because I loosened it and loosened the straps on the binding and it didn't change.

This happens to me if I don't loosen my binding up when I'm riding the lift, maybe the pressure of the board on your front foot is too much. I loosen up my front binding a few clicks before getting on the lift, and rest the tail of my board on my rear foot (chews up my laces a bit, though). You could go to a qualified ski boot fitter and they might be able to help you out too, they usually shape the liner of ski boots to relieve pressure points. I think your boot liner can be sculpted the same way.

I once bought a new pair of boots, tried them on in the store and everything felt fine. I took them out riding the next day and felt some extreme pressure on my left toes. I'd primarily tested the right boot for fit, and since it was basically the same product (different year) as what I had ridden for the past few years, I didn't walk around on the left boot in the store. I went down to the lodge and discovered that some packing material was lodged between the liner and the outer boot down near the front of the boot!
_________________________
Mark Cushman

Top
#207751 - 30/01/2005 02:36 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
Hey Tony,

How near (or naught) are you to Lovers' Leap?

Just the curious climber in me wants to know..

Top
#207752 - 30/01/2005 02:38 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: mlord]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
(Obligatory/Explanatory photo from The Leap attached)

(Notice the "Reverse Engineer" T-Shirt, too!)


Attachments
247291-z0016339.jpg (213 downloads)



Edited by mlord (30/01/2005 02:39)

Top
#207753 - 30/01/2005 02:43 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: mlord]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
And.. oh frig, what the He--.. here's another (very different) photo from the same trip (attached). This one's called "The Ride Home".

Cheers


Attachments
247292-z0016591.jpg (193 downloads)


Top
#207754 - 30/01/2005 07:07 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
Quote:
I had a fantastic day of carving turns in buttery snow under gorgeous clear skies.


_________________________
-- roger

Top
#207755 - 30/01/2005 14:45 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: mlord]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
How near (or naught) are you to Lovers' Leap?

I tried looking up the exact place in Mapquest and it comes up empty. From other sites I get the impression that it's near Lake Tahoe somewhere, and that's the general vicinity of where I snowboard.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207756 - 30/01/2005 14:49 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: cushman]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
This happens to me if I don't loosen my binding up when I'm riding the lift, maybe the pressure of the board on your front foot is too much.

Actually, it's the opposite for me. Things start to feel better after I've ridden the lift for a while. Then I start carving down the slope, and something about the tension in my right foot as I control the board makes the littlest piggy go numb.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207757 - 30/01/2005 15:23 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
Here is a map. Lovers is on Rt50, near the bottom left area on that map.

Cheers


Edited by mlord (30/01/2005 15:23)

Top
#207758 - 30/01/2005 17:18 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: mlord]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Ah, it's right on 50 near Southlake. Cool.

Most of the snowboarding I do is north of the lake, in the Truckee/Donner area. That spot is about an hour's drive from where I board. Not because it's really all that far... more because the mountain roads in that area are so narrow and squiggly.

I go to Southlake a lot to gamble, though. That's about 10 minutes from there.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#207759 - 01/02/2005 04:47 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: mlord]
canuckInOR
carpal tunnel

Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
What, exactly, are you standing on, there? It looks an awful lot like nothing.

Top
#207760 - 01/02/2005 07:31 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: tfabris]
loren
carpal tunnel

Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
I made it up to Northstar today and gave the boots a good romping. I had the same exact toe problem you talked about. My front foot pinky toe was numb by the end of the afternoon, but it was definitely from the pressure of the lower binding. Never had that happen before. Not sure what can be done about it either. Anyhow... BEAUTIFUL day. I forgot how much I like Northstar, definitely one of my favorites. Kelly had a great time too... she's finally getting the hang of it!
_________________________
|| loren ||

Top
#207761 - 01/02/2005 12:48 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: canuckInOR]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
Quote:
What, exactly, are you standing on, there? It looks an awful lot like nothing.


Pretty close to nothing. There's a slight smooth ripple of a dyke under there, just enough to hold one's self, so long as one is very very careful not to wiggle or twist the feet once they're weighted.. 5.10-

Cheers

Top
#207762 - 01/02/2005 15:31 Re: It's all about the wood. [Re: loren]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
Quote:
I made it up to Northstar today and gave the boots a good romping.

If you're ever interested in going up to Donner Ski Ranch (it's cheap), please give me a buzz, I want excuses to head up there and use my season pass. Even during the week; I can take days off.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >