Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#279396 - 12/04/2006 07:12 RAID0 or individual volumes?
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5682
Loc: London, UK
So, my shiny new computer has built in SATA RAID, and I've got two SATA disks for it. My question: should I configure the two drives for striped (RAID0) operation, or as separate volumes?

I'm looking for performance, rather than reliability -- important information will be stored on a RAID5 array in another PC, which is backed up semi-regularly.

My expected usage will be gaming, Visual Studio 2005, and potentially Microsoft Virtual Server or VMWare.

I was going to opt for RAID0, for simplicity, but someone I was talking to yesterday said that this only makes streamed reads faster, and that I'd get better performance by putting the OS on C: and data and virtual hard-disk images on D:, where the drives can seek independently of each other.

Thoughts?
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#279397 - 12/04/2006 07:38 Re: RAID0 or individual volumes? [Re: Roger]
Shonky
pooh-bah

Registered: 12/01/2002
Posts: 2009
Loc: Brisbane, Australia
No exact experience, but I have some thoughts.

If you run two separate drives you run two separate file systems. I think that would be an advantage but I can't give a plausible reason why exactly.

Splitting things between the two separate drives is likely to give advantages if you say ran two virtual machines at once. In that case I'd keep one on each drive. I don't think generally putting the system on one and the virtual drives on another will make a lot of difference unless you are running low on RAM and the pagefile starts getting used a lot. In that case you have bigger (easy to solve) problems.

If you run striped RAID0, I think the main performance increase you will see is reading large continuous chunks of data. I don't think it helps seek times etc too much.

All my 2c
_________________________
Christian
#40104192 120Gb (no longer in my E36 M3, won't fit the E46 M3)

Top
#279398 - 12/04/2006 11:06 Re: RAID0 or individual volumes? [Re: Roger]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14484
Loc: Canada
I don't know what O/S you plan on using, but with a good O/S and, say, a 128-256KB stripe size, the drives will frequently be sent off on separate file missions concurrently. This helps performance a fair bit.

Using separate JBOD drives is a manual attempt to do the same thing, except it requires lots of tuning by the user. RAID0 just achieves it automatically.

Cheers

Top
#279399 - 12/04/2006 11:58 Re: RAID0 or individual volumes? [Re: mlord]
Roger
carpal tunnel

Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5682
Loc: London, UK
Quote:
I don't know what O/S you plan on using


Windows XP x64.

Quote:
but with a good O/S and, say, a 128-256KB stripe size


I guess this depends on the quality of the drivers. This is an Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe, so it's an nVidia RAID chip.
_________________________
-- roger

Top
#279400 - 13/04/2006 09:00 Re: RAID0 or individual volumes? [Re: Roger]
blitz
addict

Registered: 20/11/2001
Posts: 455
Loc: Texas
I run a RAID0+1 at the office for a database intensive GIS application. It is considerably faster than the single drive system I had. My kid had a RAID0 set up with 2 of these. It was very fast until one of the drives cratered. If performance is your only concern, then go for the RAID0.

Top