Oh f***k

Posted by: CrackersMcCheese

Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 10:31

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4703777.stm
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 10:34

...agreed...

Edit: CNN sounds like they are downplaying it for now...
Posted by: andym

Re: Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 11:36

Tell me about it, I'm down here at the moment. Got off the train at Euston just after 1 and found the underground was closed. I then couldn't take my usual route to BH because of the policemen and ambulances.

So I'm now sat in the basement, probably the safest place to be, oh no hold on, that would be home.....
Posted by: pgrzelak

Re: Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 11:49

The strange thing, from what has been published so far, is that the explosions were all low power. It is almost as if whoever was behind it wanted to make a statement - panic, but no (or not as much) death. That makes it seem like either someone made a mistake in manufacturing the bombs, or a different group was involved acting as a copycat.

From one report, it sounds like at least one of the bomb carriers was surprised to have survived, and expected more...

Sick, no matter how you look at it.
Posted by: andym

Re: Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 12:00

Or just stupid fuckwits who can't build bombs, pathetic worthless morons.
Posted by: tman

Re: Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 12:29

Quote:
Or just stupid fuckwits who can't build bombs, pathetic worthless morons.

If so then I'm glad they're that stupid. A dud bomb is obviously better than one that works.
Posted by: andym

Re: Oh f***k - 21/07/2005 13:28

Yes, a thick terrorist is probably less dangerous than a smart one.