#219961 - 15/08/2001 00:15
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5688
Loc: London, UK
|
Yeah, the Receiver is 10Mbps-only. But it seems that you've had it working on the same switch, just with the server on a different machine.
When it fails to work, check the error message displayed on the front. It'll tell you which network adapter (ethernet/PNA) it tried to boot from, and whether it got an IP address or not.
If it's attempting to boot from PNA, then there's a link problem. Check this out first.
If it's not getting an IP address, then there's a problem with the DHCP server -- try running your own. The Receiver will work perfectly with the Win2k DHCP server, or with dhcpd on Linux.
If it's getting an IP address, then it's failing to find either the NFS or HTTP server.
If it's finding the NFS server, the logo on the display changes (it acquires an extra dot, IIRC).
If the second kernel finds the NFS server, then the screen changes to display the Audio Receiver logo, and says "Finding music server" in a box.
If it's still not working, I'd suggest getting a network trace and taking a look at it. If it's not obvious, send the trace to me (rlipscombe@riohome.com), and I'll take a look at it.
Roger - not necessarily speaking for empeg
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
ajpaterson
|
07/05/2001 09:08
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
07/05/2001 10:17
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
altman
|
07/05/2001 14:23
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
07/05/2001 14:25
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
mardibloke
|
07/05/2001 18:11
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
07/05/2001 22:26
|
SRVANY - WOL ethernet
|
sidney
|
12/07/2001 09:58
|
Re: SRVANY - WOL ethernet
|
tfabris
|
12/07/2001 10:17
|
Re: SRVANY - WOL ethernet
|
Roger
|
12/07/2001 11:12
|
Re: SRVANY - WOL ethernet
|
mardibloke
|
12/07/2001 12:27
|
Re: SRVANY - WOL ethernet
|
altman
|
13/07/2001 03:31
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
Roger
|
08/05/2001 07:48
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
Big John
|
12/05/2001 13:43
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
altman
|
12/05/2001 14:28
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
digimark
|
13/08/2001 21:47
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
14/08/2001 09:59
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
digimark
|
14/08/2001 16:50
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
mardibloke
|
14/08/2001 17:15
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
14/08/2001 17:28
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
Roger
|
15/08/2001 00:15
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
15/08/2001 09:19
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
digimark
|
15/08/2001 05:31
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
mardibloke
|
15/08/2001 08:35
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
15/08/2001 09:18
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
mardibloke
|
15/08/2001 13:01
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
Roger
|
15/08/2001 11:15
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
tfabris
|
15/08/2001 09:23
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
Roger
|
15/08/2001 11:17
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
loren
|
15/08/2001 17:24
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
digimark
|
16/08/2001 06:51
|
Re: Win 2k, ME, or Win98?
|
mardibloke
|
14/08/2001 14:12
|
|
|
|