Quote:
Right, and I've sent you patches before. My question is, in your opinion, would bringing ext3 support up to more recent versions of the code be a difficult undertaking in terms of conflict with other files that may have been modified as part of the development of Hijack?


Nope. It (ext3 code) lives pretty much in its own self-contained directory under fs/

The original patch to include it from scratch was fairly invasive, but just updating it by a few minor kernel releases should be okay.

There's zero chance of the current ext3 code being usable, though. But perhaps a newer backport in the 2.2.xx kernel series would be easy, and maybe a backport from an early 2.4.xx kernel might also be remotely possible.

Cheers