Originally Posted By: tman
Originally Posted By: Shonky
So based on those numbers if wireless worked you'd see about the same thing throughput wise.

Huh? Whats wireless got to do with it?

Was just saying that my powerline runs at about one quarter of the rated speed and wireless about one half. i.e. 85Mb/s powerline is roughly equal to 54Mb/s wireless.
Originally Posted By: tman
Originally Posted By: Shonky
What you're saying about throughput I doubt though. The signals are going at what about 1/3 the speed of light? Distance mainly affects latency not throughput. Do a ping test. On a LAN you should get ~1ms (or better) pings if working well enough. Maybe that's not what you mean but that's how I read it. Maybe you did mean that the longer length would cause more signal loss/slower speeds.

I'm not talking about the actual distance. What affected me is that it was going through the breaker panel. The signal strength was affected when it had to go through circuit breakers. If I plugged the two units into the same circuit then I'd get significantly better throughput. One unit downstairs and one unit upstairs would have the same issues as having one unit in the garage. I never really looked into it that much but the only explanation I could come up with was that it didn't like the circuit breakers for some reason.

Houses in the UK are all single phase so I didn't have the issues that houses in NA would experience where the house can be fed with 2 phases.

Just how I read it - you were saying it had to "travel all the way to the breaker panel". Any sort of extra impedance (i.e. switches/breakers) in the lines will most definitely affect signal quality and thus throughput. I'm not in the US and yes we have similar single phase systems.


Edited by Shonky (15/01/2011 20:18)
_________________________
Christian
#40104192 120Gb (no longer in my E36 M3, won't fit the E46 M3)