#166678 - 19/06/2003 16:44
SWF Conversion?
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12341
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
What's the best way to convert Flash animations to some sort of video file?
I've gotten some Flash files out of my Temp Internet Files, and I'd like a method that didn't include Quicktime or RealPlayer, if possible.
Thanks!
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166679 - 19/06/2003 16:48
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Dignan]
|
addict
Registered: 05/05/2000
Posts: 623
Loc: Cambridge
|
Use a screen capture utility that can make a video clip?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166680 - 19/06/2003 16:52
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Dignan]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 16/06/2000
Posts: 1682
Loc: Greenhills, Ohio
|
And here I was thinking you didn't want to be a single white female anymore
_________________________
Laura
MKI #017/90
whatever
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166681 - 19/06/2003 17:06
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Dignan]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
You can use Quicktime to do it. Load up the SWF in there and then Export. I'm pretty sure this requires Quicktime Pro.
Edit: I've done this before, but I can't seem to get it to work now for some reason. It claims that the SWF has no audio track, so none gets saved. But I've done it before. Weird.
Edited by wfaulk (19/06/2003 17:18)
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166682 - 19/06/2003 17:06
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Laura]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 24/01/2002
Posts: 3937
Loc: Providence, RI
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166683 - 19/06/2003 18:32
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Laura]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12341
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
Excellent one, Laura
Bitt, I was hoping to avoid Quicktime, but I have heard solutions using it for what I want to do, so I guess I'll go ahead and install it. Argh, I didn't have Real or Quicktime installed on my system last week, and now I'm using both of them! booo
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166684 - 19/06/2003 19:21
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Dignan]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Other than the annoying UI, I don't see why folks have a problem with Quicktime. It's head and shoulders better than either of the other two major players for ``streaming'' and it doesn't have any take-over-your-computer tendencies, as long as you tell it not to. You have to manually disable the tray icon under Windows, but that's pretty easy.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166685 - 19/06/2003 19:53
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12341
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
It's not that easy, and you can't fully uninstall the program either.
I'll try it again and see how it does.
Actually, I never liked the interface. No bubbles for me please. I like straight edges. Why else would I use Win2K?
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166686 - 19/06/2003 20:25
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 12/02/2002
Posts: 2298
Loc: Berkeley, California
|
and it doesn't have any take-over-your-computer tendencies
<OFFTOPIC>
Way Back When, Qucktime used to without fail take over MIDI files in netscape. Now, I hate midi background music as much as the next guy, so I would always keep them muted in my soundcard mixer. Once QT took them over, it would output them as WAVs. I searched and reinstalled multiple times looking for the option to not have it take over MIDI files, but it always did. I still havn't forgiven quicktime.
</OFFTOPIC>
Matthew
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166687 - 19/06/2003 20:29
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Laura]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
And here I was thinking you didn't want to be a single white female anymore Interesting to note that each of those three criteria require significantly different amounts of effort and expenditure to change.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166688 - 19/06/2003 20:33
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: matthew_k]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
True. I forgot it used to be much more evil than it is now. It never descended to levels of RealPlayer horror, though.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166689 - 19/06/2003 20:44
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12341
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
I'll agree with that
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166690 - 19/06/2003 20:52
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Interesting to note that each of those three criteria require significantly different amounts of effort and expenditure to change. Michael Jackson seems to have taken care of the last two...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166691 - 19/06/2003 21:52
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12341
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
I also cannot find a way to export the audio with the video of a Flash file. I'm amazed they would not offer this option.
I tried importing audio from a video in Cool Edit Pro, but it only get the first audio clip in a file. So if the flash has an intro, only the intro will get imported.
I also tried exporting the audio from Winamp. It seemed okay, but I got stuttering inbetween clips and the whole thing cut off really early.
Argh...I'm still trying though.
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166692 - 20/06/2003 00:05
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12341
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
Oh, and here is the perfect program for getting sounds out of Flash animations.
And now that I have sufficiently completed the tasks I set out to complete, I bid you all a good night. Time for sleep...all 4 hours of it...:(
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166693 - 20/06/2003 01:10
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
addict
Registered: 05/05/2000
Posts: 623
Loc: Cambridge
|
Being a Mac user, where QuickTime is heavily integrated into the OS, is used in almost every application and works very elegantly, it's easy to forget what a horror it is on Windows.
For me, QT would occasionally blow up when installing a Windows service pack or security update, although I'm sure it's just coincidence that it happened three or four times.
I had one problem where whenever anything to do with QT appeared on the screen, the icons and graphic down the left of the start menu would get corrupted and turn into grey static. This survived even through a reinstall of QT.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166694 - 20/06/2003 03:05
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
|
I don't see why folks have a problem with Quicktime
It doesn't have a full-screen mode on Windows.
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166695 - 20/06/2003 03:59
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: Roger]
|
addict
Registered: 05/05/2000
Posts: 623
Loc: Cambridge
|
It doesn't have one on Mac OS either. You have to pay for the pro version to get it. Quite why that's a pro feature is still unknown, however.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#166696 - 20/06/2003 05:58
Re: SWF Conversion?
[Re: David]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
That's about the only reason I get a Pro license, in fact.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|