Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#287266 - 29/09/2006 04:25 Should we really be unofficial?
jbauer
veteran

Registered: 08/05/2000
Posts: 1429
Loc: San Francisco, CA
Since empeg/Rio/SonicBlue/etc. are no more, there will really never be an "official" empeg BBS... Is it time that we became "official"?

- Jon

Top
#287267 - 29/09/2006 05:06 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: jbauer]
loren
carpal tunnel

Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
well...



Attachments
287939-logo.gif (104 downloads)

_________________________
|| loren ||

Top
#287268 - 29/09/2006 05:26 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: jbauer]
boxer
pooh-bah

Registered: 16/04/2002
Posts: 2011
Loc: Yorkshire UK
Why bother with official? Why not just "The Empeg & Rio: Car; Receiver;Central; Karma BBS".
Just delete the discussion point as to whether its official or not.
_________________________
Politics and Ideology: Not my bag

Top
#287269 - 29/09/2006 13:53 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: boxer]
hybrid8
carpal tunnel

Registered: 12/11/2001
Posts: 7738
Loc: Toronto, CANADA
Why not just remove any point of contention about what's discussed in here at all? Just remote the whole title completely.

Na, just kidding. Drop the empeg/rio part and just call it "the Official BBS"
_________________________
Bruno
Twisted Melon : Fine Mac OS Software

Top
#287270 - 29/09/2006 14:59 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: hybrid8]
boxer
pooh-bah

Registered: 16/04/2002
Posts: 2011
Loc: Yorkshire UK
(a)It comes up with a mountain of sites, nothing to do with us, if you google, including "The Official BBS - faq"
(b) Somebody from outside our community, similarly googling, wishing to find out about Empegs, would never find us.
_________________________
Politics and Ideology: Not my bag

Top
#287271 - 29/09/2006 15:01 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: boxer]
jbauer
veteran

Registered: 08/05/2000
Posts: 1429
Loc: San Francisco, CA
I like Loren's suggestion and graphic. Let's keep our unofficial heritage, but update it with a more dignified officiality.

- Jon

Top
#287272 - 29/09/2006 15:13 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: jbauer]
peter
carpal tunnel

Registered: 13/07/2000
Posts: 4180
Loc: Cambridge, England
FWIW I always think of an "unofficial" BBS as similar to a "non-government-run" mass media; in other words an important check-and-balance, and withal more dignified and credible than the "official" sort. And if one's allowed to unilaterally declare officialness just because the original group that could have bestowed officialness has disappeared without doing so, there's way cooler things we could be than the official Empeg BBS: how about the Official Douglas Adams BBS, or perhaps the Official Concorde BBS? Or maybe we could crown ourselves the Official Holy Roman Emperor?

Peter

Top
#287273 - 29/09/2006 15:25 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: peter]
boxer
pooh-bah

Registered: 16/04/2002
Posts: 2011
Loc: Yorkshire UK
Or "The thoughts of Chairman Boxer"
_________________________
Politics and Ideology: Not my bag

Top
#287274 - 29/09/2006 17:23 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: jbauer]
Dignan
carpal tunnel

Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12338
Loc: Sterling, VA
I'm guessing that there's a moderator/administrator who got a kick out of this thread and changed the title of the BBS
_________________________
Matt

Top
#287275 - 29/09/2006 17:28 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: Dignan]
peter
carpal tunnel

Registered: 13/07/2000
Posts: 4180
Loc: Cambridge, England
Quote:
I'm guessing that there's a moderator/administrator who got a kick out of this thread and changed the title of the BBS

Oh, cool, I was wondering if he'd done that to everyone or just to me

Charlemagne

Top
#287276 - 29/09/2006 18:25 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: peter]
jbauer
veteran

Registered: 08/05/2000
Posts: 1429
Loc: San Francisco, CA
Great! I love this BBS.

- Jon

Top
#287277 - 29/09/2006 18:37 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: peter]
hybrid8
carpal tunnel

Registered: 12/11/2001
Posts: 7738
Loc: Toronto, CANADA
Hopefully it won't get changed before Google has a chance to index.
_________________________
Bruno
Twisted Melon : Fine Mac OS Software

Top
#287278 - 29/09/2006 19:24 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: Dignan]
Mataglap
enthusiast

Registered: 11/06/2003
Posts: 384
Just a minute ago I was skimming all the open tabs and looking for "empeg". "I swear I have the BBS open," I told myself. "Where the 'ef is it?"

--Nathan

Top
#287279 - 29/09/2006 19:38 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: peter]
webroach
old hand

Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
I prefer "Holy Roman Empegger"...
_________________________
Dave

Top
#287280 - 29/09/2006 20:23 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: peter]
music
addict

Registered: 25/06/2002
Posts: 456
Quote:
Quote:
I'm guessing that there's a moderator/administrator who got a kick out of this thread and changed the title of the BBS

Oh, cool, I was wondering if he'd done that to everyone or just to me

Charlemagne


There's still a little Hadrian's wall around the proprietary parts
of the source code....

(Cue Roger Waters, "Bring Down the Wall! Bring Down the Wall!" )

Genghis Khan

Top
#287281 - 29/09/2006 22:36 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: peter]
jimhogan
carpal tunnel

Registered: 06/10/1999
Posts: 2591
Loc: Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm guessing that there's a moderator/administrator who got a kick out of this thread and changed the title of the BBS

Oh, cool, I was wondering if he'd done that to everyone or just to me

Charlemagne

It must be just you. I don't see *anything*.
_________________________
Jim


'Tis the exceptional fellow who lies awake at night thinking of his successes.

Top
#287282 - 30/09/2006 14:47 Re: Should we really be unofficial? [Re: jimhogan]
lectric
pooh-bah

Registered: 20/01/2002
Posts: 2085
Loc: New Orleans, LA
Check the title bar.

Top