Is the topography such that he can't get an antenna pointed at Leesburg?
That was what I was thinking. It looks like he's on the other side of a range from Leesburg, but once you're over that range it seems pretty flat. An antenna of some sorts could provide access to everyone on the side of the range he's on.
Also, ain't "4G" and satellite both about 1.5m?
Definitely not, that sounds more like 3G. 4G was technically supposed to be 100Mbps, but the carriers are getting away with far less. I don't know what the 3.5G carriers are doing, but Verizon's actual 4G LTE service has users regularly reporting over 21-25Mbps. Of course, that's only in cities where it's carried and apparently it's pretty spotty, but so was 3G.
Which satellite provider do they have? From experience with my mothers rural living situation, Hughes net (DirecTV) service has degraded badly over the past few years, possibly due to oversubscription. She switched to WildBlue, and the difference in service is noticeable. Latency is still bad (due to the nature of using geosynchronous satellites), but the bandwidth is good enough for streaming services once they get past the latency issue. The downside is that not much streaming can be done, due to the bandwidth caps.
I can't quite remember which company they went with at the moment. I'll have to confirm that. I think the latency is still going to be an issue when it comes to the insurance company setting him up with the equipment for a home office. I think they'd want him to have a service capable of VPN and remote desktop stuff. The bandwidth is an issue with all wireless carriers unfortunately
As far as other solutions, DSL was slowly being rolled out by various small companies in rural Colorado. And an old coworker of mine who lives in rural Texas outside Austin had some sort of 802.11 based wireless solution. I'll try to contact him to see what company he uses, to give you ideas there. Unfortunately I have a feeling the up front cost is going to require a business to be involved, one willing to put up the initial capitol to build it out, then recoup the costs over time with subscriptions.
That's what I figured for this guy and his neighbors. I don't think price would be an issue, either. He's currently paying $85/month for crappy sattelite, I'm sure he'd pay more for something good. I'd appreciate it if you could ask that guy for info.
Is there any kind of wireless other than satellite there? There is a company in Minnesota that has wireless in the rural areas. I no nothing about it other than it isn't satellite. I have just drove by their billboards.
I haven't heard of any services like that around here. Normally it isn't much of a concern, as Leesburg is considered less and less of a rural town. There's definitely people living in remote parts of it, though.
What speed do you need to get?
Honestly, I think he'd be happy with a nice solid 5-8Mbps as long as the latency wasn't terrible. Of course, more is always better
In the 802.11 space, there have been a bunch of multihop (roof-to-roof) vendors over the years. I once stayed in a rural house that had such a setup. It worked well, when it worked, and spent minutes at a time completely failing to work.
I was thinking of something like this. Either a multihop thing or some sort of mesh network. I just don't know where to look for that kind of thing, and half of that kind of setup would still be figuring out the origination of the network.
Thanks for the input, folks.