#76868 - 06/03/2002 11:59
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 09/09/1999
Posts: 1721
Loc: San Jose, CA
|
Shouldn't the Anna Vu meter correspond with the volume dB scale? With the overdrive part in "red" ? Maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about.
Calvin
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76869 - 06/03/2002 12:02
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: time]
|
member
Registered: 17/08/1999
Posts: 151
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Okay to clear up what the visual is actually displaying I'll tell you exactly what the needle deflection means.
Each needle represents each channel (left & right) - For mono MP3s the visualisation library is conned into thinking it has a stereo signal with the same data in each channel regardless of the current visual.
Each needle can deflect by a maximum of 90 degrees. At any point in time the actual deflection of a needle is the decay damped rms of the audio. That is to say that if the rms of the current frame exceeds the decay damped value from previous frames that rms value becomes the new decay damped value, if it does not then the previous decay damped value is used and then decayed by a constant amount.
According to Time's reference this means that the visual is correctly named as the rms signal is used. The decay damping (and lack of attack damping to some extent) can be regarded as the method used to digitally model an analogue VU meter.
Given that the samples used in generating the RMS value are 16 bit signed then the maximum possible rms value (based on a square wave) is 32767.
Because the positioning of 0db sets at what point the rms value is being measured relative to it is important that this point is meaningful. The convention in analogue electronics is to use the rms of the maximum possible sine wave to measure the signal relative to. Our signal is bounded by the square wave maximum so this would be a logical choice (to position 0db at the far right of the scale) - However it is would probably be more in keeping with the theme of an analogue vu meter to use the sine wave to position 0db.
Therefore the position of 0db should be:
(90 degrees divided by the square root of two)degrees from the left of the scale.
The square wave is 3db louder than the sine wave so that positions another point at the far right of the scale.
The far left of scale is -infinity decibels (subject to debate), it just remains to make the scale meaningful between 0db and -infinity db.
Hope all of this makes sense,
Toby.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76870 - 06/03/2002 12:40
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: prolux]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
(90 degrees divided by the square root of two)degrees from the left of the scale.
And this number is?
(Don't have a SQRT button on the Windows Calculator )
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76871 - 06/03/2002 12:44
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
Don't have a SQRT button on the Windows Calculator
Tony, your forgetting to apply MS logic to the problem. Go to View, Standard, and there is your SQRT button on the right upper edge. No clue why the scientific one dosen't have it, then again I do only trust RPN calculators anyhow.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76872 - 06/03/2002 12:45
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: drakino]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76873 - 06/03/2002 12:48
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: drakino]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Why duplicate functionality? Not that I believe that's the reason sqrt isn't there...
You do have a x^y button that will do sqrt if you give it 0.5 as second argument.
/Michael
_________________________
/Michael
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76874 - 06/03/2002 12:48
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Wait, that can't be right. That tells me that 0db should be about 63-64 degrees from the far left of the scale.
SQRT of 2 is 1.414...
90 divided by 1.414 is 63.649...
So that means 0db would be on the left third of the scale instead of towards the right.
I'm doing it wrong or not understanding something.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76875 - 06/03/2002 12:50
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
AFAIK start to end is 90 degrees, mid scale (straight up) is at 45 degrees...
/Michael
_________________________
/Michael
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76876 - 06/03/2002 12:57
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: mtempsch]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
He said "from the far right end of the scale".
EDIT: I just re-read it. He said LEFT end of the scale. I am an idiot. All is well.
/me goes to work on the image.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76877 - 06/03/2002 13:06
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Okay, the 0db marker was pretty close to that point. Just have to move it a couple pixels to the left and mess with it some more. Cool...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76878 - 06/03/2002 14:05
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: prolux]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Okay, attached is my latest stab at an Anna VU visual replacement.
For those that wish to try it, upload it to the player as vuback.raw into /empeg/lib/visuals as instructed here.
The 0db point is about (as close as I could get it with low-rez pixels) at 64 degrees from the left end of the scale. The right end of the scale is labeled as +3, and the left end of the scale is numbered approximately what Tim suggested.
I think that it is not possible to get it perfectly accurate to the real world, and this is about as close as we're ever going to get it.
Attachments
76243-vuback.raw (272 downloads)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76880 - 06/03/2002 14:14
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
|
Very Nice!
_________________________
Brad B.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76881 - 06/03/2002 14:21
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Thanks. Now the question is whether or not this meets Toby's criteria to use as the "official" Anna VU visual....
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76882 - 06/03/2002 14:32
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
|
And thanks for the FAQ entry.... that was the first time I sent a file to the player and all went well! (I always get worried when mounting the music partition rw takes several minutes!)
The engineers here at work approve!
EDIT: 1 thing about the FAQ... it doesn't mention to change the Hyperterminal (assuming that is what people mostly use) to Zmodem. I believe (at least in my case - w. a 2 day old install of Win2k) it defaults to ZModem w. Recovery or something similar...
Edited by SE_Sport_Driver (06/03/2002 14:37)
_________________________
Brad B.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76883 - 06/03/2002 14:52
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
I always get worried when mounting the music partition rw takes several minutes
I think it was Mark Lord that pointed out that one can add the nocheck option to the mount command in the rwm script to speed it up.
You can change the /bin/rwm script to contain the following (the red stuff is the change).
==============
#!/bin/sh
mount -n -o remount,rw,nocheck /drive0
[ -e /proc/ide/hdb ] && mount -n -o remount,rw,nocheck /drive1
==============
If you edit the file on a non-Unix machine, use an editor that can save the file with unix style linefeeds. After (re)uploading, make sure the file is executable, default permissions seem to be 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
/Michael
_________________________
/Michael
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76884 - 06/03/2002 15:11
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 17/10/2001
Posts: 265
Loc: Portland OR
|
Very nice!
I especially like the lower left screw head being rotated...
_________________________
DarioMK2 in an Impreza 2.5RS
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76886 - 06/03/2002 15:22
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
new poster
Registered: 20/09/2001
Posts: 17
Loc: Seattle, WA.. USA
|
Looks and works great!
_________________________
John Karwoski
MarkII 120Gig, MarkII 60Gig backup
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76887 - 06/03/2002 15:28
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
Mmm.. I'd really prefer if the upper right screw were the same orientation as the lower left.. symmetry or something.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76888 - 06/03/2002 15:40
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
It's deliberately asymmetrical.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76889 - 06/03/2002 16:18
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: drakino]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 13/09/1999
Posts: 2401
Loc: Croatia
|
What's wrong with INV x^2 ?
Besides, *everybody* knows that 1/sqrt(2) ~ 0.707
_________________________
Dragi "Bonzi" Raos
Q#5196
MkII #080000376, 18GB green
MkIIa #040103247, 60GB blue
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76890 - 06/03/2002 16:20
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 17/10/2001
Posts: 265
Loc: Portland OR
|
I knew it was, that's why I mentioned it.
It's one of those subtle things, that I think most people wouldn't notice, kinda like those two thin horizontal lines on Trinitron monitors, only not as annoying.
I actually like it being rotated... I think it gives it more of a quirky, non-mainstream feel.
_________________________
DarioMK2 in an Impreza 2.5RS
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76891 - 06/03/2002 18:14
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: Diznario]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 23/09/2000
Posts: 3608
Loc: Minnetonka, MN
|
kinda like those two thin horizontal lines on Trinitron
they should put warnings on the box about those they are annoying
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76892 - 06/03/2002 22:18
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: msaeger]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 04/02/2002
Posts: 277
Loc: Massachussetts
|
VERY ! cool... I love it, kudos, keep up the good woork
_________________________
__________
davecosta
Hijacked 60GB MKIIa 2.0b13
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76893 - 06/03/2002 23:41
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 20/11/2000
Posts: 279
Loc: Pacific Northwest
|
Dude, YOU ROCK!
Nice work Tony! It looks great!
Thanks!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76894 - 07/03/2002 11:49
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: time]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Thanks!
Hey, Toby. Tim likes it. Does that mean it can be the default visual now?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76895 - 07/03/2002 13:36
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
addict
Registered: 16/08/1999
Posts: 453
Loc: NRW, Germany
|
A suggestion here - let alternative versions of a visual to be selected by using the "select mode" button on the remote, like when changing the visuals that sometimes leave trails. Then we can all choose the version we prefer, and the visual selection menus don't end up being any more massive than they are.
_________________________
(list 6284, Mk1 S/N 00299 4GB blue [sold]. Mk2 S/N 080000094 20GB blue)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76896 - 07/03/2002 16:55
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: tfabris]
|
member
Registered: 05/09/2000
Posts: 174
Loc: Irvine, CA USA
|
Interestingly, I have some audio test signals on my empeg.
When I play a -14db Sine wave reference, the numbers line up perfectly with the expected value, just a hair to the right of the -15 mark.
When I play a 0db sine wave, the needle pegs at +3! I thought Toby had said that only a square wave could push it that high, or was I reading it wrong?
Anyway, I love it! Very cool!
_________________________
_____________
James Mancini
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#76897 - 08/03/2002 05:00
Re: VU Meter numbering?
[Re: ClownBurner]
|
member
Registered: 17/08/1999
Posts: 151
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Could you send me the files you are using please?
Thanks
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|