Why would that be, in your opinion?
Leaving aside the comparison with film, I would argue that if there's a time needed by the sensor to react (1-2 in my little diagram above), which has no impact on the final result of the shot you're taking (shot 1), that same delay would simply transfer to the following shot (shot 2) and in that case, too, it would have no impact on the final result of shot 2.

In any case I still think reasonable to assume that time to react for a sensor is irrelevant and possibly significantly less relevant that that of the chemical reaction of a film, assuming both sensor and film are hit by photons at the same time.