Yeah, but you're just arguing semantics, really. The idea that killing something is rewarding in and of itself is heinous, IMHO. I mean, it's not as if these people must kill (directly) to survive. They go out in the woods and shoot something because the killing rewards them, no matter what kind of satisfaction it is. If they were out there just for the sake of the hunt, they could just as easily take pictures as fire a bullet (or arrow, or whatever).

(Again, I recognize that most of us, myself included, rely on the deaths of animals to survive, but we don't have to be, and, IMHO, shouldn't be, proud of it or take pleasure in it.)