Quote:
...Brad, I read with interest Webroach's very recent, critical post. I think I have to agree with what he's saying. It's not enough to be the ganged-up-on minority. With statements like the "neocon" one above, I gotta ask how much research you are doing.


I'm confused. I said that "neo-con" is "most commonly used to mean conservative Jew". And THIS was only said after Tony made reference to those pesky "neo cons". And the whole point of that paragragh was to say I don't mind being called conservative so I don't understand why some liberals get so defensive about it.

Bitt gave more details that give some context and history to the origins of "neo-con". That supported my "common usage" statement.

Jim agreed that he proudly calls himself a liberal and doesn't view it as an attack (or even when it is, it's not an effective one).

So what's the gripe here?
_________________________
Brad B.